General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This post will probably sink like a stone... [View all]Southern_gent
(97 posts)Disagree with almost every point” is a fair starting place, but if you’re going to dismiss nearly everything I said, it would be helpful to know why. Simply saying “I disagree” without elaboration doesn’t move the conversation forward—it just leaves me guessing what you’re taking issue with.
Do you disagree that history is actively preserved through museums, documentaries, and online platforms? Are you arguing that broadcasters and athletes should hold the same cultural significance as world-changing events or historical figures? Or do you genuinely believe that younger generations are clueless about history despite the many ways they engage with it on modern platforms?
If there’s a specific point you’d like to address, let’s hear it. I’m open to a real discussion, but blanket disagreement without substance doesn’t challenge anything I wrote—it just avoids the debate entirely. Let’s dig into the details, and I’m happy to engage thoughtfully.
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):