Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm not meaning to cause trouble or to place blame [View all]Iggo
(48,540 posts)2. Unless you ask Biden, you're not going to get a useful answer. Especially not here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unless you ask Biden, you're not going to get a useful answer. Especially not here.
Iggo
Thursday
#2
Agree. A couple other points are that a) he was viewed as a very even-handed judge and that's
allegorical oracle
Thursday
#8
So, if "he wasn't working for the U.S. despite his paycheck," who was he working for?
Ocelot II
Thursday
#15
My implication is clearly that he was working AGAINST the U.S., not "for" it.
Think. Again.
Thursday
#19
IMO, both Biden and Garland knew what a chitshow trying trump would be. trump deserved it, but it obviously didn't
Silent Type
Thursday
#9
I disagree. IMO Garland purposefully dragged his feet and delayed prosecuting and jailing trump...
brush
Thursday
#11
Maybe, but Biden could have picked up the phone at any time and said get it in gear or you are fired.
Silent Type
Thursday
#20
What good does it do to act when you can't get your target and you enhance their hold on
Silent Type
Thursday
#43
Federalist Society member Garland should've never been picked. Biden didn't owe him shit...
brush
Thursday
#10
He certainly is a favored leader if his multiple speeches to them are any indication.
Think. Again.
Thursday
#18
Prosecutors don't jail anybody. Judges jail, and only *if* a jury finds the defendant guilty
Ocelot II
Thursday
#25
Never mind. I see you remain an attorney who sees both sides instead of the elephant in...forget it.
brush
Thursday
#41
I don't think Biden is that disappointed, Garland and Biden are both institutionalist but there comes a point where ...
uponit7771
Thursday
#16
Obviously, 100% certainty of conviction is not a requirement for the DOJ to prosecute...
Think. Again.
Thursday
#31
He probably couldn't come up with a good reason that wouldn't make him look bad
Jose Garcia
13 hrs ago
#50