Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm not meaning to cause trouble or to place blame [View all]ForgedCrank
(2,391 posts)36. ALSO "my words"
In his opinion, those conditions didn't exist and would have likely ended in failure.
The context matters, that is unless conflict is the only real goal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unless you ask Biden, you're not going to get a useful answer. Especially not here.
Iggo
Thursday
#2
Agree. A couple other points are that a) he was viewed as a very even-handed judge and that's
allegorical oracle
Thursday
#8
So, if "he wasn't working for the U.S. despite his paycheck," who was he working for?
Ocelot II
Thursday
#15
My implication is clearly that he was working AGAINST the U.S., not "for" it.
Think. Again.
Thursday
#19
IMO, both Biden and Garland knew what a chitshow trying trump would be. trump deserved it, but it obviously didn't
Silent Type
Thursday
#9
I disagree. IMO Garland purposefully dragged his feet and delayed prosecuting and jailing trump...
brush
Thursday
#11
Maybe, but Biden could have picked up the phone at any time and said get it in gear or you are fired.
Silent Type
Thursday
#20
What good does it do to act when you can't get your target and you enhance their hold on
Silent Type
Thursday
#43
Federalist Society member Garland should've never been picked. Biden didn't owe him shit...
brush
Thursday
#10
He certainly is a favored leader if his multiple speeches to them are any indication.
Think. Again.
Thursday
#18
Prosecutors don't jail anybody. Judges jail, and only *if* a jury finds the defendant guilty
Ocelot II
Thursday
#25
Never mind. I see you remain an attorney who sees both sides instead of the elephant in...forget it.
brush
Thursday
#41
I don't think Biden is that disappointed, Garland and Biden are both institutionalist but there comes a point where ...
uponit7771
Thursday
#16
Obviously, 100% certainty of conviction is not a requirement for the DOJ to prosecute...
Think. Again.
Thursday
#31
He probably couldn't come up with a good reason that wouldn't make him look bad
Jose Garcia
13 hrs ago
#50