Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do the American people know this? [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(54,808 posts)51. So in your book the reader should do all the work. Every reader should spend a minute looking it up
There have been over 5,000 views of this thread. Assume there are 1,200 unique viewers. So you think it is a good use of time that 1,200 viewers spend 1,200 minutes looking it up. That is 20 hours.
I think it would be a much better use of time if the OP spent say 10 (ten) minutes getting the data and formatting it nicely.
20 hours (or whatever a more accurate estimate is) is a waste compared to 10 minutes. Wouldn't it be a kindness if the OP did a little work to smooth the reader's task?
A poster could have two different motivations to posting. 1) They want to share an insight or fact and help people understand it. 2) They are writing so that they can look at their own writing and who the hell cares about anyone else.
I, being me, assume that almost all posters here have motivation #1 and thus would be motivated to do the ten minutes of work to share the fact or insight.
Demanding that the reader do the work would be motivation #2. You, are free to endorse and support and advocate motivation #2.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

1: Point drops are useless. It's percent that counts. 2: Dow is 1896 price-weighted adding machine index. Use SP500
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 5
#4
one suspects point drops may be a bigger deal to most people than intellectual per centage drops.
msongs
Apr 5
#6
" And the political party of the Presidents who presided over the largest % drop in the Dow Jones"
usregimechange
Apr 5
#16
So in your book the reader should do all the work. Every reader should spend a minute looking it up
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 6
#51
Exactly. Regardless, anything worth doing is worth doing as best as one is able. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 7
#54
The work of being nice if you notice something missing from a post and request it be added.
RandomNumbers
Apr 7
#55
This would make a great information ad in a newspaper. Maybe Ms Walton could spring for it.
jalan48
Apr 5
#9
Yes, volatility is an important part of the story, as is uncertainty. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 5
#14
He will stick to it; not gonna change any time soon. He posted Friday and Saturday
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 5
#40
I don't know about "90%" but yes his ego and his investment conflicts of interest are definitely factors
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 6
#47
All of the GOP stock market analysts whom I read, recognize that DEMOCRATIC Presidents
Jack Valentino
Apr 5
#32
If they didn't before, they do now. Great eye-opening info. Thanks, usregimechange.
wordstroken
Apr 6
#45