General Discussion

leftstreet

(38,673 posts)

4. No. Just no. n/t

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Mon Dec 8, 2025, 12:36 PM

Monday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Poll Reveals Clear Democratic Favorite in 2028 White House Race [View all] applegrove Monday OP

Please no one suggest we must nominate one of our many highly qualified women-- I SOOO WANT TO DO SO, BUT... hlthe2b Monday #1

I hate that! Happy Hoosier Monday #6

We must nominate someone who can win TexasBushwhacker Monday #9

No, it demonstrates sexism TheProle Monday #10

YOU do NOT get to suggest I am "sexist!" for gawd's sakes. That you would suggest that of ME or ANY OTHER WOMAN hlthe2b Monday #12

No one called you sexist. I said it demonstrates sexism. TheProle Monday #14

Shame belongs to anyone who will not critically analyse the CURRENT situation so as to protect our ability hlthe2b Monday #16

To pre-judge a woman as incapable of something, simply by virtue of being a woman, is prejudice. Literally. TheProle Monday #17

NO ONE used the term or suggested incapable. SHAME ON YOU AND YOUR ATTEMPTS TO ATTACK me or any other hlthe2b Monday #19

Not trolling whatsoever TheProle Monday #21

Your last sentence says it all. Kingofalldems Monday #26

JHC---what a horrible try that was. Kingofalldems Monday #25

If you see something you think violates TOS, alert the post TheProle Monday #27

i'm sure everyone here would agree with that statement orleans Monday #39

It's an incredibly supportive community TheProle Monday #41

i am not pre judging any women rampartd Monday #29

Exactly Bettie Monday #67

So shame on Michelle Obama then according to you awesomerwb1 Monday #23

I'll say it angrychair Monday #48

M Obama didn't say ask for permission awesomerwb1 Monday #53

My question still stands angrychair Monday #55

I question the need to spell this out at this time. Hope22 Monday #63

It demonstrates the reality of a country where sexism still holds a slight majority. FascismIsDeath Monday #56

but, but, but - "the party is paying the price of not being BOLD enough ... " stopdiggin Monday #13

And there was no way a black man could be president EdmondDantes_ Monday #31

Timing is everything. No one is saying never. Obama was lightning in a bottle. We will have our female lightning hlthe2b Monday #34

agree agree agree. thank you! nt orleans Monday #40

That's simply an opinion, and one I don't share. EdmondDantes_ Monday #47

uh, huh hlthe2b Monday #52

It is overly apparent popsdenver Monday #36

If "one of our many highly qualified women" declare their candidacy and win the nomination, then great. maxsolomon Monday #37

If we don't have Trump on the ballot or Putin putting his thumb on the scale IronLionZion Monday #38

Please no one suggest that Kamala Harris, a great candidate, lost just because of her gender. thought crime Monday #59

No. That was not the only reason. hlthe2b Monday #60

What about my comment was "so damned dismissive" or "beyond inappropriate"? thought crime Monday #62

The only thing stronger than racism in this country is Bettie Monday #65

We have to nominate someone who can/will WIN Jilly_in_VA Monday #2

Personally, I WANT a candidate who can WIN thought crime Tuesday #68

Newsom has guts. He took on tRump when others stayed in the shadows, cowering. Sibelius Fan Monday #3

No. Just no. n/t leftstreet Monday #4

Love me some Newsom. But how will he play in GA, NC, PA, MI, WI, AZ in a general election? NCDem47 Monday #5

I'm afraid I have the answer to that ... And it's kinda' what you thought ... -(nt)- stopdiggin Monday #7

You could have said similar things about Obama in 2005 tinrobot Monday #11

As they say in legal land: NCDem47 Monday #18

I would suggest we don't run away from California's success. tinrobot Monday #20

That may be (the California issue), but I don't think we have anyone better pinkstarburst Monday #30

He is a white Christian hetero man so that alone makes him more likely JI7 Monday #24

My concern also. Lonestarblue Monday #33

millions of which - have never in their lives voted in a primary stopdiggin Monday #8

I'll be late to my decision again, putting it off until I know who is running Torchlight Monday #15

Polls at this point are simply name recognition. There will be a robust primary of exciting and qualified Nanjeanne Monday #22

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #28

I want to know what role his Trump Troll writer would have RockCreek Monday #32

His social media team is young and dynamic, social media savvy. AloeVera Monday #61

In an actual primary, i can see AOC taking it. SSJVegeta Monday #35

Mark Kelly would be better. intheflow Monday #42

In case it's Mark, just keep in mind DFW Monday #44

JOISY!!!! elleng Monday #57

He's my own early first choice for the 2028 nomination - of course, we'll have to see how he does in the primaries Midwestern Democrat Monday #54

And we'll never nominate the one out of that bunch who is obviously the most qualified to take over on day one DFW Monday #43

I love Pete genxlib Monday #50

Too bad Sen. Kelly has to choose HariSeldon Monday #45

I love Newsome, blueknight73 Monday #46

Let love cast a 'spell' on you... NT GJGCA Monday #64

I will not be voting in the Presidential (D) Primary. ... aggiesal Monday #49

They are getting way over their skis JustAnotherGen Monday #51

I like Newsom and would have no problem supporting him but 2028 is several lifetimes away in politics. FascismIsDeath Monday #58

Way too early. We have any number of good politicians to choose from. Emile Monday #66