Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(107,063 posts)
6. No, it is, surprisingly, the $5 million verdict that explicitly includes the sexual abuse verdict
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 08:56 AM
Thursday
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related civil lawsuits filed in federal court by American author E. Jean Carroll against United States President Donald Trump. The two suits, both overseen by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages being awarded to Carroll and are undergoing appeal efforts. The cases were related to Carroll's accusation from mid-2019 (during Trump's first term) that he sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996. Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019 (a.k.a. Carroll I).

In November 2022, Carroll filed her second suit against Trump (a.k.a. Carroll II), renewing her claim of defamation and adding a claim of battery[a] under the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations. The suit went to trial in April 2023. Evidence included testimony from two friends Carroll spoke to after the alleged incident, a photograph of Carroll with Trump in 1987, testimony from two women who had separately accused Trump of sexual assault, footage from the Trump Access Hollywood tape and his October 2022 deposition. In reaching the verdict, the judge asked the jury to find if the preponderance of the evidence suggested that Trump raped Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition of rape at that time, denoting forcible penile penetration. The jury instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse, as well as defamation, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages. Trump unsuccessfully made a counterclaim and appealed to the Second Circuit. Trump then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case in June 2026.

In September 2023, Kaplan issued a partial summary judgment regarding Carroll I, finding Trump liable for defamation via his 2019 statements. The jury verdict from the January 2024 trial was $83.3 million in additional damages. Trump secured a bond for this amount plus 10% to appeal. The Second Circuit rejected his effort in April 2026. Trump's team indicated that it would ask the Supreme Court to use the Westfall Act to swap the Department of Justice in as defendant, which would moot the case as the federal government cannot be sued for defamation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

You might think that the one with the finding of sexual abuse would carry the higher damages, but that's the justice system for you.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not if you're the president. spanone Thursday #1
Correct me if I'm wrong, House of Roberts Thursday #2
No, it is, surprisingly, the $5 million verdict that explicitly includes the sexual abuse verdict muriel_volestrangler Thursday #6
OK, generally I don't delve into details House of Roberts Thursday #11
Be sure to downplay trump's allegations of exploiting kids, NYT.... Blue Owl Thursday #3
Iokiyar Blues Heron Thursday #4
That's essentially what the article says. maxsolomon Thursday #21
My knife is out for the NYT because of the way it admires what the Republicans do muriel_volestrangler Thursday #23
The Republicon male candidates know blubunyip Thursday #5
Being a molester, rapist, pedo is a badge of honor for the r's. R women absolutely love their men that way. erronis Thursday #12
Sad headline, but accurate. harumph Thursday #7
Read the excerpt. These are not self-aware journalists. They're excuse-making scum (nt) muriel_volestrangler Thursday #8
Thank you MV, I will. harumph Thursday #9
Cost talent. Wow. From a certain point of view. But man it is an ugly world they bolster. lostnfound Thursday #10
If he did it once, and admits to it ... FakeNoose Thursday #13
This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Thursday #16
I can't concur with this: "I'd rather lose the race and the Senate." Martin Eden Yesterday #32
That's probably how a lot of low info low involvement people see it as well. BannonsLiver Thursday #14
Fetterman Was Considered Talent modrepub Thursday #15
Only for Democrats Zelda_Orchid Thursday #17
But voters will reward the party for that down the road. BannonsLiver Thursday #18
Regarding who might take Platner's place... GiqueCee Thursday #19
We elected a fucking serial rapist as the president of the United States, dipshits! Initech Thursday #20
They know that. They just can't publish that. maxsolomon Thursday #22
I know, it's so damn infuriating. Initech Thursday #25
In the end, Death. maxsolomon Thursday #26
Senate majority is extremely important Martin Eden Yesterday #33
Just 1 chamber will do it. maxsolomon Yesterday #34
Senate confirmations for cabinet, possibly Supreme Court Martin Eden Yesterday #36
I don't have time to read, but the GOP kicked out Tony Gonzales at the same time, we kicked out Swalwell LeftInTX Thursday #24
sexually assaulting someone means they can not take no for an answer rampartd Thursday #27
It was the right choice nerdytrey825 Thursday #28
Let the GOP be the hypocrites. surfered Thursday #31
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #37
Written from a perspective every bit as amoral (at best) as the republican party's unblock Thursday #29
I am glad that they made it clear that Rs are the ones ignoring these allegations senseandsensibility Thursday #30
I've been saying for years Bettie Yesterday #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Actual NYT headline: "Doe...»Reply #6