Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SpankMe

(3,319 posts)
7. Two non-rhetorical questions:
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 01:05 PM
Tuesday

1. Has any other FCC chair done this?
2. What role does the federal government have in network/affiliate contract negotiations?

On question 2, I know that there is law requiring that TV and radio stations "serve the public interest". This has been given wide latitude to cover everything from Walter Cronkite evening news broadcasts to right-wing religious radio. The public is encouraged to provide comment to the FCC with complaints as to whether or not the station is serving the public interest. In theory, this feedback is taken into account during broadcast license renewals. Licenses cover only frequency allocation and broadcast power. Not content. The widest possible first amendment latitude is afforded these licensing decisions.

For an FCC to send what is clearly a threat letter like this East German Stasi stuff that is pretty far away from 1st amendment principles. Democrats in congress should agitate for investigation.

Weaponization of government, indeed.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's FCC nominee sends...»Reply #7