Editorials & Other Articles

travelingthrulife

(1,131 posts)

7. Maybe a coop distribution system? I don't necessarily mind paying for subscription

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue Oct 29, 2024, 03:13 PM

Oct 29

But I don't want to have to manage dozens of subscriptions to read the sources I enjoy. Nor do I want to pay a full subscription when I only read an article or two now and again. Subscriptions have become too time consuming and annoying with all the passwording, etc.
Why not have many national/international/local news sources available for subscription under a single umbrella. WE get to choose to which papers we subscribe. I would even subscribe to local news then.

Like cable programming except we choose and they don't rip us off.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Washington Post and LA Times just stepped into a bigger political mess than the one they tried to avoid [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 26 OP

Are there any newspapers that aren't owned by wealthy people? marybourg Oct 26 #1

I doubt most people can afford to. Customers believe they should be able to read for free online... Hekate Oct 26 #3

All true. Pointless to rail against newspapers owned by wealthy people. marybourg Oct 26 #4

My take is: "We don't want to upset either side of the political enviornment" chouchou Oct 26 #2

nope Skittles Oct 28 #5

With respect to Mr. Joel: You may be right... I may be crazy. chouchou Oct 29 #6

Maybe a coop distribution system? I don't necessarily mind paying for subscription travelingthrulife Oct 29 #7