Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

In reply to the discussion: Thanks Merrick [View all]

Autumn

(46,976 posts)
1. Thank you, very happy to rec. Glad you got this post in under the wire. Expert says
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 02:44 PM
Dec 24

only a few days left. Now that I have that out of the way, I wonder why the legal experts here never mention this part

paying a minor for sex alone is a violation of the federal sex trafficking statute, no transportation or coercion required (and an alleged trafficker not knowing an alleged victim’s age is not considered a defense)
Garland certainly knew that If it's true. But all they have said since yesterday is that she was legal in the state of Florida, they repeat that part like parrots. Garlands office oh which he is in charge of, didn't know that sex trafficking is a federal offense?

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Thanks Merrick»Reply #1