Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
6. You have a point,
Sat Aug 4, 2012, 11:56 AM
Aug 2012

good referendum are simple - not complex.

I'm confused about the CA resolution. I thought CA was the same as NV - the language of the resolution has to be the same as that on the petition. Was there some change to the language, or some thought that this is the problem of people being willing to sign almost anything, but not willing to put their money where their pen went?

Because the federal government does not have the option of referendum, I think many people who live in states that do not use direct democracy tools would be completely confused and distrustful of a national referendum (not that we have a process for one). The closest we seem to have is the 'poll' - and it seems to me that polling has consistently shown at least some majority for single-payer systems - when the question is posed in a way that people understand what is asked.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Single Payer Health Systems»Wouldn't it be grand if w...»Reply #6