Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Twinguard

(531 posts)
4. Maple bodies are definitely bright.
Thu Nov 29, 2012, 01:07 PM
Nov 2012

My biggest concern about maple bodies is that they tend to be quite heavy. Ebony, bubinga, walnut, and wenge bodies will also be very bright, and also pretty heavy (and expensive). One thing luthiers do to reduce the weight is to make a body of ash or mahogany and then cap it with a piece of maple (in fact, my current build is ash with a maple top and 1/4" wenge stringers). Ash is fairly bright, alder will be less so, and mahogany is fairly dark sounding, but all three options with a maple top will be noticeably lighter than a solid maple body and still pretty bright.

A maple neck is always a good choice since maple is very stable. An ebony board on it is going to be quite bright, a maple board is also going to be nice and snappy. You might also consider bloodwood, wenge, or even pao ferro for a bright sounding board.

I don't want to sell you on wood choices that you might or might not want based on my own personal findings, I just want to let you know that there are many options, and some of the options will weigh less or cost less and still give you a sound that you will enjoy.

Another thing to consider is that, in most cases, the wood offers subtle tone differences compared to the differences you can get with different pickups, different strings, different picks (or plectrums if you prefer), different hardware, and different amps. An ash Telecaster with a maple board strung with stainless steel wound strings played through a Fender Twin Reverb with the treble and presence cranked will be almost painfully bright. A mahogany Les Paul played through the same setup will also be bright, but far easier on the ears.

A standard alder body/maple neck setup will also be brighter with a brass nut, high mass (brass) bridge, and single coils or P-90s than the same guitar with a bone or graphite nut, graphite saddles, and humbucker pickups. There are a bunch of parts to a guitar and they all, to one degree or another, have an affect on the tone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Anybody have any experience building guitars? [View all] LeftOfSelf-Centered Nov 2012 OP
I'm a bit of a luthier. Twinguard Nov 2012 #1
Thanks! LeftOfSelf-Centered Nov 2012 #2
Maple bodies are definitely bright. Twinguard Nov 2012 #4
Thanks for the info LeftOfSelf-Centered Nov 2012 #6
I'm not sure about any legal conflict between Warmoth and Gibson. Twinguard Nov 2012 #5
I'm fairly worried... LeftOfSelf-Centered Nov 2012 #7
Bad news. LeftOfSelf-Centered Dec 2012 #18
That's terrible news. Twinguard Dec 2012 #19
The best Strat I ever played... jeepnstein Nov 2012 #3
I can only imagine how much work goes into building an acoustic! LeftOfSelf-Centered Nov 2012 #8
Take your time, do it yourself. jeepnstein Nov 2012 #9
Well, I got all the unimportant stuff out of the way... LeftOfSelf-Centered Dec 2012 #10
You're halfway there... jeepnstein Dec 2012 #11
Dat Guitar! LeftOfSelf-Centered Dec 2012 #12
I'm more of a Bakersfield Sound kind of guy. jeepnstein Dec 2012 #14
I had to look up the Bakersfiled sound, I wasn't familiar with it :) LeftOfSelf-Centered Dec 2012 #17
Just cigar box guitars and diddy bows Tom Ripley Dec 2012 #13
Thanks for this thread. I'm learning from it. I may want to build a guitar one day. We'll see. Scuba Dec 2012 #15
Yeah, I never really considered building a guitar. LeftOfSelf-Centered Dec 2012 #16
yes i have ashleywilliam Dec 2012 #20
I Put A Warmouth Neck On A Strat ProfessorGAC Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Musicians»Anybody have any experien...»Reply #4