Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(118,071 posts)
3. Good news.
Thu Oct 18, 2018, 10:48 PM
Oct 2018

While I understand the need to have a cap on non-economic damages due to excessive jury awards, the caps that are being proposed are so low that it will discourage plaintiff attorneys from taking on new clients because they are on a contingency basis.

The myth of tort reform is that by capping damages it will result in a drastic savings in insurance premiums. The truth is that even insurance companies know that if fiction. One of the major medical professional liability insurers estimated that tort reform proposals will only reduce premiums by 3% - 4% at most.

Full disclosure: I was the tort reform statistician for the Department of Insurance for over a decade.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arkansas»Arkansas Supreme Court st...»Reply #3