Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Illinois

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:15 PM Mar 2012

Illinois Eavesdropping Amendment Bill Killed In Illinois House [View all]

Good ol' SpringPatch. Maybe they shouldn't have combined it with the telephone recording issue, which just confuses the issue more. Deal with taping cops on it's own.

(Also, it's hard to believe this Reboletti clown has a JD from Valpo...)

A bill that would have amended Illinois' controversial Eavesdropping Act to allow on duty police officers to be recorded in public spaces was voted down in the state House Wednesday.

<snip>

Although a Cook County judge ruled the law unconstitutional earlier this month, the law remains on the books, leaning on a similar statewide requirement that all parties consent before conversations can legally be recorded.

Introduced by Rep. Elaine Nekritz, House Bill 3944 would have legalized recording police officers on duty in public spaces, and would permit recipients of telephone solicitations to record their end of the conversation if the caller verbally reserves the same right.

But opponents of the exemption, like Rep. Dennis Reboletti, who voted against HB 3944, argue that the law should protect civil servants before civilians. “Why should [the police] have to go get a court order to record these people when these people can record them?” Reboletti told the State Journal-Register.

The Eavesdropping Act has had several high-profile challenges this year, including lawsuits from Tiawanda Moore, who allegedly recorded police trying to persuade her to drop a sexual harassment charge against another officer, and Christopher Drew, an artist who was threatened with prison time for recording his own arrest on civil disobedience charges. In both cases, judges ruled against the state's eavesdropping policy.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/23/illinois-eavesdropping-am_n_1373688.html?ref=chicago
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Illinois»Illinois Eavesdropping Am...»Reply #0