Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

exboyfil

(18,055 posts)
2. Should he have been charged?
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:50 AM
Jan 2018

Now he is a martyr. The customer should have pulled out his phone, and put it on Youtube. I don't think Cermak would do very well in Iowa City after that.

Here is the statute -

b. A person commits harassment when the person, purposefully and without legitimate purpose, has personal contact with another person, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or alarm that other person. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires, “personal contact” means an encounter in which two or more people are in visual or physical proximity to each other. “Personal contact” does not require a physical touching or oral communication, although it may include these types of contacts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Trump's America Skittles Jan 2018 #1
Should he have been charged? exboyfil Jan 2018 #2
Comments section Proud liberal 80 Jan 2018 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Cairycat Jan 2018 #4
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»Iowa City business owner ...»Reply #2