Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kansas

getagrip_already

(17,566 posts)

1. of course, it would put more responsibility on men.......

Reply to KS Toronado (Original post)

Sat May 11, 2024, 05:51 PM

May 2024

so it is a bad idea. child support is bad in their eyes at any age. if a woman doesn't want to stay married, and won't give custody to the father (even if he doesn't want it), then screw her, no child support.

And certainly not before birth. It's only a person to be prevented from abortion, not to benefit the mother.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Faux pas

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kansas governor vetoes child support for fetuses [View all] KS Toronado May 2024 OP

of course, it would put more responsibility on men....... getagrip_already May 2024 #1

Putting more responsibility on men is not why that bill was a bad idea. ShazzieB May 2024 #2

Exactly what the repugnuts were doing KS Toronado May 2024 #3

Not only declaring fetuses to be full-fledged persons slightlv May 2024 #4