Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(47,500 posts)
7. People born January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 were not born in the 21st century, so whilst correct that
Mon Mar 25, 2024, 07:11 AM
Mar 2024

all those born in the 21st century (Jan 1, 2001 and onward) would be banned, the article still leaves the wrong impression in terms of the actual start date of the 21st century.

The ban also includes born born in 2000 AD, which was the last year of the 1990s, the last year of the 20th century, and the last year of the 2nd millennium.

It is simple maths.

The same goes for when you actually legally attain the next year of age.

You obtain the next age legally the day before your birthday, as you legally complete the full year on the day before you were born.

Example: A person born on June 2, 1923, turned 100 years old (if they were still alive) on June 1 (not June 2) 2023.

I know this to be a legal fact in the US, as an American friend of mine that I went to uni with in Los Angeles was born on November 9, 1998. She was upset as she thought that she would miss out on being to vote in the 2016 US election by one day, as it was held on November 8, 2016. I told her no, she legally turned 18 on November 8, 2016, and thus could vote. Her father called the board of elections and confirmed this, and she did indeed vote in the 2016 US presidential election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Court upholds town bylaw ...»Reply #7