Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

New Mexico

PoindexterOglethorpe

(26,894 posts)

5. I do not believe that's true.

Reply to MichMan (Reply #4)

Tue Aug 28, 2018, 12:21 PM

Aug 2018

If someone is not part of the bargaining group, not a member of the union, the employer is free to pay that employee at a different rate. At least that's what a quick Google search turned up.

Sometimes an employer with a small workforce will do the smart thing and pay more than the going rate for that job. But they don't try to break a union by paying the non union workers more. Too bad. So meanwhile the ones who refuse to join are not paying their fair share for the benefits they get.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Mexico asks union workers to waive First Amendment rights [View all] TexasTowelie Aug 2018 OP

As a former union member I'm appalled. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #1

I don't think getting rid of the exclusive bargaining clause is a good idea MichMan Aug 2018 #2

If only companies offered better wages and benefits PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #3

They are not allowed to MichMan Aug 2018 #4

I do not believe that's true. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #5

Not sure you meant what you posted MichMan Aug 2018 #6

I did mean it. I also found some stuff on line that does indicate PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #7