Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pennsylvania

FakeNoose

(36,369 posts)

7. They need scannable ballots, because those can be verified and preserved

Reply to questionseverything (Reply #6)

Fri May 20, 2022, 02:13 PM

May 2022

They'll never go with "verbal" counts because no verification would ever be possible.

As long as every ballot is checked and verified, it should be the most foolproof. It's also the slowest way to do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Editorial: Botched Lancaster ballots undermine voter confidence [View all] FakeNoose May 2022 OP

Sounds like a setup - sabotage? - to "prove" elections are rigged or tainted in some way bucolic_frolic May 2022 #1

It seems that nobody is proof reading or taking responsibility for accurate ballots FakeNoose May 2022 #2

I would want the printing co.investigated to determine HOW the coding was asiliveandbreathe May 2022 #3

I'm not in Lancaster, so I'm only guessing this FakeNoose May 2022 #4

Someone needs to investigate, my main concern - like the incorrect asiliveandbreathe May 2022 #5

Why don't they just hand count the ballots the scanner won't read? questionseverything May 2022 #6

They need scannable ballots, because those can be verified and preserved FakeNoose May 2022 #7

That's odd because when i go to the bank the teller does a questionseverything May 2022 #8