Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(102,693 posts)
3. That's pretty irrelevant
Wed Jun 22, 2022, 06:51 AM
Jun 2022

It's not that the people around him were all checking the latest police records before making the threats and assaults. They'd just heard the initial "his girlfriend saw it in the release papers". As the article says:

He also reported threats and assaults to the police, the court heard. But visits by police welfare officers to Temple’s home only fuelled unfounded suspicions about him, the court was told.

So he would have explained it to the police. But even if they had reissued correct release papers, it's not a situation where he can tell anyone "hang on a minute, I've got proper release papers here about sausage roll theft, ignore what you heard earlier, look, the police even gave me a written statement saying it had been a mistake". Vigilantes don't pause to ask the victim if he has evidence he's innocent.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Man arrested for stealing...»Reply #3