Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(8,090 posts)
2. I'm not going to get into a blow-by-blow rebuttal of a gish gallop
Fri Oct 11, 2024, 07:56 AM
Oct 2024

Since you seem to have been so interested in the case, here are the Private Eye reports I referred to:

Special Reports
The Lessons of the Lucy Letby Case

MD on medical experts and a fair trial

By Dr Phil Hammond (MD)

After Lucy Letby was convicted in August 2023 of murdering seven babies, a number of experts contacted Eye columnist MD because they "believe the science and statistics presented at the trial were incomplete and flawed and that the case against Letby was not proven beyond reasonable doubt". In this five part Special Report Dr Phil Hammond lays out the case of why he thinks the nurse should be allowed to appeal.

https://www.private-eye.co.uk/special-reports/lucy-letby


I don't know if they made it across the Pond, but other UK media have been picking through the evidence as anomalies emerge, such as The Telegraph. Private Eye itself casts doubt on the insulin poisoning. Anything I might have to say about the case is in its reports.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Lucy Letby: police and CP...»Reply #2