Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

applegrove

(125,785 posts)

10. Yes. You are very knowledgeable. I had not thought

Reply to NNadir (Reply #9)

Mon Apr 7, 2025, 02:51 PM

Apr 7

of storing nuclear waste in comparison to the release of carbon and pollution from fossil fuels. Both externalities. My head went BABoom!!!! I recognized your name. I know you have been on here for ages. I had just never engaged in such a scientific discussion. Thank you for informing me. I feel better about nuclear fuel.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal regulator approves Canada's first small modular reactor [View all] OnlinePoker Apr 5 OP

Chris Keefer is going ballistic over this. NNadir Apr 5 #1

And the Candu can use spent fuel rods to make power. applegrove Apr 6 #2

This is true. However from my perspective would be to isolate plutonium from used fuel, and make a ternary fuel... NNadir Apr 6 #3

Wow. You know your stuff. I can't compute. applegrove Apr 6 #4

Thank you. I have spent an enormous amount to time wrapping my head... NNadir Apr 7 #5

My worry about it is the waste and how long the rod applegrove Apr 7 #6

Again in term of so called "waste," the superiority of nuclear should be self evident. NNadir Apr 7 #7

Are you AI? applegrove Apr 7 #8

No, I'm quite human, a scientist with an extensive journal here stretching over two decades. NNadir Apr 7 #9

Yes. You are very knowledgeable. I had not thought applegrove Apr 7 #10