Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Public Transportation and Smart Growth

CoopersDad

(2,984 posts)

2. Safer for cars, maybe, but every lane makes it harder for pedestrians.

Reply to BComplex (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 1, 2023, 01:18 PM

Sep 2023

Extra lanes for bikes, sounds good.

In California, terrible legislation in 1970 forced planners to build more lanes or move new projects further from destinations because cars are king and congestion was bad for the air.

The result was sprawl and the state now scores projects differently: reduce vehicle miles traveled = less sprawl.

Transit and bike lane and sidewalks are the better way to go, but we also need to build housing closer to jobs, affordable housing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mocking the terrible policy of adding lanes. [View all] CoopersDad Sep 2023 OP

More lanes are definitely safer with fewer accidents. BComplex Sep 2023 #1

Safer for cars, maybe, but every lane makes it harder for pedestrians. CoopersDad Sep 2023 #2