Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
6. The problem is that a viable Palestinian state means that the settlements have to go - all of them.
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 09:12 PM
Jun 2016

These "offers" apart from being too vague to be meaningful or offered under circumstances that made them worthless didn't address that issue at all. Not removing any settlements doesn't mean an "end to settlements", and the possible land swaps that would keep a Palestinian state viable won't include areas where the settlements are. I've shown you a map of the settlements in the West Bank before, and I've tried to show you how every single settlement is an impediment to a viable Palestinian state.

It's simple: Israel can keep the settlements or have a Palestinian state, but not both...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»I知 Not Anti-Israel, I知 ...»Reply #6