Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israeli

(4,319 posts)
11. U.S. Warns 'NGO Law' Could Have 'Chilling Effect' on Israel's Civil Society
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 11:39 PM
Jul 2016
Critical comments from U.S. come after EU issued a similar warning of the effects of the 'NGO Bill.'

Barak Ravid Jul 12, 2016

The U.S. voiced severe criticism Tuesday of a new Israeli law that targets left wing organizations. The so-called NGO Law, officially named the Transparency Law and passed into law Monday, could have a "chilling effect" on the activities of civil society organizations in Israel, the U.S. State Department said.

John Kirby, the spokesperson for the State Department, said that though a number of the White House's concerns that were voiced before Jerusalem were addressed in the law's final wording, the U.S. is "still very concerned about the impact this law might have on the worthwhile activities of Israeli NGOs."

He further said that U.S. President Barack Obama has said on numerous occasions that freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, civil society and the ability to voice dissent and criticism are hallmarks of a healthy democracy.

The law, which passed its second and third readings 57-48, mandates special reporting requirements for nongovernmental organizations that get most of their funding from foreign governments, and, according to critics, disproportionately targets human rights organizations.

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.730547

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israel NGO bill, seen as ...»Reply #11