Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]shira
(30,109 posts)1. Principles And Politics: The Southern Poverty Law Center Loses The Plot
In addition to threats of violence by Islamic fundamentalists, liberal critics of Islam are increasingly abandoned. At best, we are inconvenient afterthoughts, at worst, bigots and hate-mongers.
The intellectual confusion and moral paralysis plaguing the Western Left around the religion of Islam has done much to add credibility to the Western Right. Embodying the now-common approach of elevating politics over principle, the Southern Poverty Law Center has accused the ex-Muslim atheist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz of anti-Muslim extremism.
In the recently issued report Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists, the SPLC claims to have identified 15 anti-Muslim extremists who it believes are represented too often in mainstream media.
These extremists, the SPLC contends, spread baseless and damaging lies in order to demonize all Muslims. The Field Guide aims to arm journalists with information so that they may challenge the hateful rhetoric and misinformation of the extremists, or better yet, deny them a public platform altogether.
Perhaps in more competent hands, a report such as this may have been a useful guide for journalists with little time to spend on background research. However, the one produced by SPLC is neither reliable nor factual, and often steers closer to the category of yellow journalism than anything worth serious consideration.
Perhaps in more competent hands, a report such as this may have been a useful guide for journalists with little time to spend on background research. However, the one produced by SPLC is neither reliable nor factual, and often steers closer to the category of yellow journalism than anything worth serious consideration.
Nuance is lost where the religion of peace is concerned, and the SPLC paints its targets with a broad, clumsy brush. Those profiled range from pundits who believe that radicals have infiltrated the CIA, FBI, Pentagon, and State Department to activists who offer compassionate, empathetic, and exceedingly balanced views on the faith. The latter is exemplified by the Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz, who spent his formative years in the service of an Islamist organization working to re-establish a global caliphate. After disavowing his former associates, he has spent the past decade working to encourage reform and secularization in Muslim countries and communities.
Nearly every charge against him in the report is patently absurd. His act of solidarity with students who wore a benign cartoon of Prophet Muhammad on a t-shirt is a cited as a qualification for his anti-Muslim extremism. Nawaz tweeted a picture of the cartoon, declaring that such trifles dont offend him.
For this conciliatory and progressive gesture, he earned the ire of the Muslim community, condemnation by liberals, and death threats by fanatics. It appears that the SPLC now polices acts considered blasphemous as anti-Muslim extremism, citing the Islamic religious belief in their indictment.
If mere tweeting of cartoons is tantamount to bigotry, one wonders how they would judge the actions of the actual cartoonists. Perhaps the SPLC list should include the creators of the show South Park for their depictions of Jesus and Mohammed. In the same vein, Andres Serranos Piss Christ surely also qualifies him as an anti-Christian extremist, along with the National Endowment for the Arts that presented him with an award. But I wont be holding my breath for the latter. In the eyes of some my fellow liberals, blasphemy is bigotry only when Islam is the target.
Nawazs entry reads like a gossip blog written by his most paranoid enemies, repeating debunked claims and rumors as factual evidence. In reference to his account of his journey to de-radicalization, SPLC ominously contends that major elements of his story have been disputed by former friends, members of his family, fellow jihadists and journalists, neglecting to substantiate this damning assessment in any form whatsoever.
Lets break that down, shall we?
The intellectual confusion and moral paralysis plaguing the Western Left around the religion of Islam has done much to add credibility to the Western Right. Embodying the now-common approach of elevating politics over principle, the Southern Poverty Law Center has accused the ex-Muslim atheist Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz of anti-Muslim extremism.
In the recently issued report Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists, the SPLC claims to have identified 15 anti-Muslim extremists who it believes are represented too often in mainstream media.
These extremists, the SPLC contends, spread baseless and damaging lies in order to demonize all Muslims. The Field Guide aims to arm journalists with information so that they may challenge the hateful rhetoric and misinformation of the extremists, or better yet, deny them a public platform altogether.
Perhaps in more competent hands, a report such as this may have been a useful guide for journalists with little time to spend on background research. However, the one produced by SPLC is neither reliable nor factual, and often steers closer to the category of yellow journalism than anything worth serious consideration.
Perhaps in more competent hands, a report such as this may have been a useful guide for journalists with little time to spend on background research. However, the one produced by SPLC is neither reliable nor factual, and often steers closer to the category of yellow journalism than anything worth serious consideration.
Nuance is lost where the religion of peace is concerned, and the SPLC paints its targets with a broad, clumsy brush. Those profiled range from pundits who believe that radicals have infiltrated the CIA, FBI, Pentagon, and State Department to activists who offer compassionate, empathetic, and exceedingly balanced views on the faith. The latter is exemplified by the Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz, who spent his formative years in the service of an Islamist organization working to re-establish a global caliphate. After disavowing his former associates, he has spent the past decade working to encourage reform and secularization in Muslim countries and communities.
Nearly every charge against him in the report is patently absurd. His act of solidarity with students who wore a benign cartoon of Prophet Muhammad on a t-shirt is a cited as a qualification for his anti-Muslim extremism. Nawaz tweeted a picture of the cartoon, declaring that such trifles dont offend him.
For this conciliatory and progressive gesture, he earned the ire of the Muslim community, condemnation by liberals, and death threats by fanatics. It appears that the SPLC now polices acts considered blasphemous as anti-Muslim extremism, citing the Islamic religious belief in their indictment.
If mere tweeting of cartoons is tantamount to bigotry, one wonders how they would judge the actions of the actual cartoonists. Perhaps the SPLC list should include the creators of the show South Park for their depictions of Jesus and Mohammed. In the same vein, Andres Serranos Piss Christ surely also qualifies him as an anti-Christian extremist, along with the National Endowment for the Arts that presented him with an award. But I wont be holding my breath for the latter. In the eyes of some my fellow liberals, blasphemy is bigotry only when Islam is the target.
Nawazs entry reads like a gossip blog written by his most paranoid enemies, repeating debunked claims and rumors as factual evidence. In reference to his account of his journey to de-radicalization, SPLC ominously contends that major elements of his story have been disputed by former friends, members of his family, fellow jihadists and journalists, neglecting to substantiate this damning assessment in any form whatsoever.
Lets break that down, shall we?
http://www.theexmuslim.com/2016/10/27/southern_poverty_law_center_loses_the_plot/
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations