Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Huh, that sounds a lot like "from the river to the sea". [View all]AloeVera
(2,138 posts)13. A "genocidal statement", no?
Of course I'm not serious.
It's the Likud Charter manifesting:
"Between the sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty."
So one is genocidal, but the other isn't. Got it. What's good for the goose isn't good for the gander.
When it comes to I/P, I've learned that the goose always gets cooked while the gander prances around his expanded territory while stepping over the dead goslings.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You should just be able to agree that it is a horrible argument without having to turn around and attack someone else.
Eko
Dec 28
#9
You didn't make much of a case, and one extremely tenuous claim does not comprise "reasons".
lapucelle
Dec 29
#11
Well I will bow to you as to the exact time frame I was talking about when I did not give an exact time frame.
Eko
Dec 29
#37
Yes, I'm sure about it. "Someone said something half a century ago" is not convincing evidence
lapucelle
Dec 29
#17
I think you can be against the smuggling of arms to a terrorist origination which was why the area was cleared
Eko
Dec 29
#38