Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
22. What plane?
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:23 PM
May 2013

Last edited Sun May 5, 2013, 10:02 PM - Edit history (1)

<a href="http://imgur.com/i0mBqyb"><img src="" title="Hosted by imgur.com"/></a>


I found this on a video that caught my eye. The reason it caught my eye was I felt the "plane" went in too fast. Then I slowed it down, and got this. This makes sense since in ALL 9/11 photos, there are NO seats. Would explain the "flash" we see before impact. A homing devise would be the flash. Say what you will, a plane would of had resistance at some point upon impact. There may have even been a wing sheered off, but that doesn't happen as we all know.

Picture NOT photo shopped. I could barely crop it as you can see. I have NO talent when it comes to trickery if you will. I even had to take a picture with a camera from the video to get this. This is just what I happened to catch one day of the many years I have been watching these videos. I know it sounds crazy and all, and I can't explain every detail of 9/11, but I have spent more time studying it than the original 9/11 "terrorist" and even I would have taken off from JFK that day, than fly a hijacked plane over military bases. But that's just me. How about you? Years in the making, but no box cutters foils your attack. Laughable to say the least.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. Not weird at all. ocpagu Apr 2013 #1
That makes as much sense as everything else related to the "truth movement" William Seger Apr 2013 #3
My point... ocpagu Apr 2013 #6
Ah. William Seger Apr 2013 #7
Sigh... ocpagu Apr 2013 #8
I see... William Seger Apr 2013 #9
Of course you don't. ocpagu Apr 2013 #10
Not by coincidence, we've been discussing that nonsense here for years William Seger Apr 2013 #11
I won't even waste my time. ocpagu Apr 2013 #12
Well, "obviously," whoever planted the part William Seger Apr 2013 #13
What makes you think it's rope? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #14
Or maybe... William Seger Apr 2013 #16
How is it "obvious" it was planted? zappaman Apr 2013 #17
How is it weird? cpwm17 Apr 2013 #2
it's a large part wedged in a weird spot and just found now? NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #4
related article here NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #5
For reference, here's where it was found William Seger Apr 2013 #15
the weird parts are NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #18
If "it was found in such a tight place" William Seger Apr 2013 #19
I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #20
'I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally" zappaman Apr 2013 #21
What plane? Politicalboi May 2013 #22
Two things William Seger May 2013 #23
yes, I'm not really sure what happened NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Large 9/11 Plane Part Jus...»Reply #22