Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Conspiracy v. fact 9/11 [View all]Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)There is no way a plane fits into the Pentagon, let alone penetrate 3 rings of steel and concrete. And planes vaporize, but DNA stands the test. Laughable. And the Pentagon that doesn't shoot down anything that comes into it's airspace is acceptable to you with this whole scenario? Second tower hit 9:03 Pentagon hit 9:46. Over 40 minutes and no manned guns on the rooftops of the Pentagon. Is that correct? Does that make sense to you?
And let's not forget the 2.3 Trillion missing announced on 09/10/01. Is that perfect timing or what. Who asked about the money on 9/11? Who's asked about it since? You, like I, will probably never know the truth, although you think you know it, just like I do. I go by what's lacking. Lacking are the reconstructions of any of the 4 planes. The FAA ALWAYS does that, but for some reason we find another part of the puzzle last week in NY. Lacking are any seats in ANY debris pictures. Laugh all you want, but show me ONE! We have all seen plane crashes, and seats bounce, and they burn. Even when they burn, they usually have metal frames that are visible. Seats should have littered the streets of NY empty and occupied. But flight 93 should of had seats everywhere around the "hole" it sunk into. LOL!
Sorry but that hole was there prior to 9/11 too. But you go on telling us how it really happened. I find you guys funny.
You'll accept such incompetence and say those who question it are the crazy ones.