Steven Dusterwald on the duty of engineers to speak out about 9/11

[William Seger]

4. You missed this: "Since there is no copyright on these materials..."

... I'm going to just post full text in the comments." Which he did.

What the link shows is that, as I said, Dusterwald is "blissfully oblivious to the fact that engineers have been speaking out about 9/11 for a long time." And what you demonstrate is what I said about willful ignorance: You don't refute anything by telling us how disinterested you are in reading what qualified experts have to say.

There certainly was a 7-hour unfought fire; WTC 7 certainly did collapse; the collapse certainly can be explained in terms of real science and actual structural engineering principles; there certainly are no magical silent explosives; and Gage's "experts" have manifestly failed to provide a single valid technical reason for thinking anything other than the fire caused the collapse, not to mention any rational reason for why the imaginary perps would have done such a thing. You're welcome to continue believing otherwise for as long as you wish and dismissing any attempt to explain it as "sophistry," and I really couldn't care very much less. And that is the future of the "truth movement."