Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

13. she did a lotta lotta damage, that is for sure. appalling. thank you. nt

Reply to stockholmer (Reply #12)

Thu Feb 16, 2012, 02:31 AM

Feb 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neoma just terminated laconicsax and me as co-hosts. [View all] redqueen Feb 2012 OP

Reason why, up top. Neoma Feb 2012 #1

was this an unilateral decision? i thought you said absolutely NO unilateral decision making seabeyond Feb 2012 #2

Fuck this. I'm heading off to the other group Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #7

. seabeyond Feb 2012 #8

Because thats easier than being part of the solution. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #15

no one who USES the forum want neoma. all you outside of the forum cheer, and feed the frenzy seabeyond Feb 2012 #16

No one? Lisa D Feb 2012 #21

I've been reading all of this and I see 4 people that all are hating on her snooper2 Feb 2012 #24

There are many who would use the forum if it were not so exclusive. LiberalAndProud Feb 2012 #37

so you chose to leave. did someone ask you to leave? did anyone force you to leave? Scout Feb 2012 #38

Of course not. LiberalAndProud Feb 2012 #40

Oh, don't worry. I'm staying right here till Neoma blocks me for daring to disagree with her... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #20

And CrispyQ and seabeyond. laconicsax Feb 2012 #3

yup. i guess that means consulting others dont matter anymore. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #4

Bad Move DonCoquixote Feb 2012 #5

This is a massive abuse of hosting powers Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #6

I got drug into this nightmare as a juror (I am a GD, Video, LBN, & Econ only poster) and I must say stockholmer Feb 2012 #9

we did have a vote. all members that use this forum has voted redqueen. no one who uses this forum seabeyond Feb 2012 #10

well, if a vote is now considered a coup d' etat, perhaps the foundational DU rules need to be stockholmer Feb 2012 #12

she did a lotta lotta damage, that is for sure. appalling. thank you. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #13

First, thank you for your sane, supportive comments. BlueIris Feb 2012 #11

"I am interested to read the perspectives of those who do not regularly post here." Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #18

There were two threads about who the group wanted as hosts, Neoma locked both of them. laconicsax Feb 2012 #14

The purpose is reinforcing stereotypes in order to keep the plebes in line. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #17

this also sets a bad precedent for other groups in DU as well stockholmer Feb 2012 #19

This is my 10th year. efhmc Feb 2012 #36

you are participating in a feeding frenzy for the entertainment value, and you have the audacity seabeyond Feb 2012 #22

(laconicsax and me) should be (laconicsax and I) FYI snooper2 Feb 2012 #23

Try this: redqueen Feb 2012 #25

That's a different sentence snooper2 Feb 2012 #26

This forum was cool. redqueen Feb 2012 #27

Looks like it is supposed to be me..That just never sounds right... snooper2 Feb 2012 #29

That's good... ScreamingMeemie Feb 2012 #32

LOL...There's a reason the count the errors snooper2 Feb 2012 #35

Good for you. nt redqueen Feb 2012 #33

I always thought it doesn't sound right, either... MadrasT Feb 2012 #34

You, of course, are correct. Doesn't anyone teach nominative and objective efhmc Feb 2012 #39

Actually, "laconicsax and me" is correct n/t MadrasT Feb 2012 #28

just FYI, you are wrong. n/t Scout Feb 2012 #30

Yep, I need to go back to school LOL snooper2 Feb 2012 #31

More fail. n/t JTFrog Feb 2012 #41

Failure is good, unless you repeat the same failures over and over.. snooper2 Feb 2012 #42