Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. IMO, being supportive isn't easy in a public chatroom
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 07:44 AM
Sep 2013

And it's not just because creeping condescension is often a component of how people formulate comfort. By that I mean statements that in often more subtle ways take the general form 'this problem is no big deal'.

Such replies are invalidating of both the problem and the distress the problem is causing someone.

More generally, in a forum like this where posts are read by both those who are ill and those experience the illness of another, a really good supportive post somehow navigates a narrow space without invalidating either side. We live in a time when advocacy deeply divides politics and it promotes a 'we are good-they are bad' chauvinism. We're well practiced at taking sides and we do it casually.

It's part of why I find being supportive a really tricky business, here are two ways things go awry.

The most obvious hypothetical first... It's easy to read a post and slip into a role of empathizing with a person complaining about something.

For example: "Oh, my mother was __________ and she made our lives miserable. ________ are just awful to be around, get that person out of your life!"

That may sound sort of like it endorses another persons suffering and it seems to set up a communication that speaks to shared experience and possibly empathy. But on the other side, if abandonment is a huge fear of people who are plagued with ______, it is going to be dreadfully painful to hear comments that disparage persons with problems similar to _______ as a class. And hearing advice that urges the action that hammers on exquisite fears for them will terrorize them. I can see how that is a bad outcome of what was meant as support.

With respect to the perspective of others, sometimes the others are in the mainstream of group thought. It's easy to slip into the flow of a thread that's endorsing mainstream ideas of the group. For example, someone uses trigger words or suggests a practice such as arm-chair diagnosis that has a group gestalt and the replies go off topic dealing with that side issue (which is simultaneously a group main issue) becoming increasingly distant from an underlying real concern of a poster. I can see how that is a bad outcome of what was meant as support.

I'm not innocent, I do these things, too. I've done at least one of them here. I think they are mistakes, and I make them. That's why I say I struggle with the task of being supportive. I do.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looking to understand [View all] no_hypocrisy Sep 2013 OP
Sounds bipolar to me elleng Sep 2013 #1
It's her choice to seek help if needed. Neoma Sep 2013 #2
I agree with Neoma, diagnosis is for the docs. HereSince1628 Sep 2013 #3
I've been to a 1000 weddings (no joke) jeffrey_pdx Sep 2013 #6
How does this work? HereSince1628 Sep 2013 #7
I guess I was patronizing jeffrey_pdx Sep 2013 #8
IMO, being supportive isn't easy in a public chatroom HereSince1628 Sep 2013 #9
Just guessing - a form of Tourette's syndrome? nt No Vested Interest Sep 2013 #4
I don't understand what I'm going through postatomic Sep 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Support»Looking to understand»Reply #9