Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
2. Was that through
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 08:50 AM
Oct 2013

Ancestry.com, by any chance?

I've been doing my family tree since 2007, and every now and then I sign up for Ancestry.com hoping for some new information.

Last time I did, a little over a year ago, I "discovered" that I was related to Eleanor of Aquitaine.

Just to make sure, I went backwards and checked each connecting person and found out that a random person had mistakenly inserted an incorrect ancestor into the line.

Too many people zealously and eagerly insert names into their family trees that don't even belong there. I've had to wipe out whole branches of mine when the GED com files I use pointed out that sons (as posted in Ancestry.com) were listed as being born before their own fathers or grandfathers.

My advice, if someone is using an online site to do genealogy work and finds a link to royalty, is to have it confirmed by trained genealogists. It could save lots of embarrassment later...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»This message was self-del...»Reply #2