Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr.Mystery

(185 posts)
13. All languages probably are NOT related.
Tue Oct 11, 2022, 10:43 AM
Oct 2022

That’s the consensus view among most linguists who research these things. It’s possible that all existing languages had one common root language, but the origins of language are too old to know one way or another.

What we do know is that wherever there are humans, they use language. So if humans developed independently of one another, they no doubt had unrelated languages.

Spanish and Italian are related because they both emerged from Latin, Latin and Greek are related because they’re both part of western Indo-European etc.

But that doesn’t mean Chinese is related to English. If they sprang from a common root language, it’s too ancient to tell.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»Magnificent Linguistic Fa...»Reply #13