Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
12. This is the part I'm referring to:
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:17 AM
Sep 2015

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12628895

The NRA blocked expanding the law to "dating partners" because, and the spokesperson really said this, "it could apply after only one date." So it's OK to beat someone on the first date? Really? That's all ya got?

The NRA also objected to categorizing strangulation as an act of violence. So go ahead, choke her into unconsciousness but don't hit her unless it's on the first date, then have at it.
============

Your OP was about expanding the definition of DV and protections to non-spousal partners. Yes, that is exactly what needs to happen but it is the stated position of the NRA to oppose any expansion or re-definition of DV. That's what I meant when I said "convince the NRA".

I'm with you, it's the NRA and frankly a lot of the regulars in this group that oppose you.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»All in the family mass sh...»Reply #12