Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

COLGATE4

(14,843 posts)
37. Interesting article about it here
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 06:17 PM
Dec 2015

But understandably, given the gun violence that has convulsed the country in recent days and weeks, much more is being said than that, much of it imputing a rationale to the seven justices who had, in fact, remained silent. “Have the justices gone gun-shy?” was the irresistible headline in The Atlantic. “Finally, Some Sanity!” proclaimed The Daily News in New York.


Linda Greenhouse
The Supreme Court and the law.
Sex After 50 at the Supreme Court
Judicial Energy and the Supreme Court
Church, State, and the Supreme Court’s Moment of Truth
Abortion at the Supreme Court’s Door
A Chief Justice Without a Friend
See More »

Implicit in a good deal of the commentary is the hope that one or more of the justices who signed on to Justice Scalia’s strained reading of history seven years ago in District of Columbia v. Heller are reacting to the country’s bullet-ridden landscape by showing symptoms of buyer’s remorse. Heller was the 2008 decision that for the first time interpreted the Second Amendment as protecting an individual’s right to “keep and bear arms,” specifically to keep a handgun at home. In addition to Justice Thomas, the others in Justice Scalia’s 5-to-4 majority were Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Samuel A. Alito Jr.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/10/opinion/guns-and-thunder-on-the-supreme-courts-right.html?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I want a gun with some... [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 OP
I think we have to distinguish between upaloopa Dec 2015 #1
I certainly can't fault you for that. discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #2
These are the weapons the Framers had in mind when COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #3
The framers never conceived the Internet. JonathanRackham Dec 2015 #4
OK. So? COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #7
Those rifles can also be looked upon as... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2015 #5
Yep. State of the art for 1787 COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #8
same as that printing press Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #11
But no assault quill pens! friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #14
or high-capacity inkwells. nt branford Dec 2015 #19
No one needs more than ten fluid drams of ink! friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #20
No not "state of the art" for that time period. oneshooter Dec 2015 #39
you'll notice that no incarnation, version or derivation... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #6
Just as the only words protected by the 1st amendment Big_Mike Dec 2015 #10
yes they do indeed Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #12
Really silly comparison. Those abound. COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #13
You want one amendment to be 'locked in time'-but not the rest... friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #16
The only purpose of the Second Amendment was COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #17
Then get it repealed. The means to do so exists, finding enough votes to do so is up to you: friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #18
Not necessary. Hopefully with a Democratic victory COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #23
You mean just like this Conservative court has reversed the ACA and Roe v Wade? DonP Dec 2015 #24
These things take time. Don't for second bet that Roe v Wade COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #25
I hope you're working on the party platform and the White House too DonP Dec 2015 #26
Our party leaders, including the President are no more immune COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #27
What happens if Congress and/or individual states don't go along? Roe v Wade is being eroded as we.. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #30
I'm no lawyer, so I don't know how many unanimous opinions are overturned Big_Mike Dec 2015 #31
This wasn't a unanimous decision. Stevens in his dissent makes it clear that COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #33
I would say that the only Presidents who did not overreach in recent times Big_Mike Dec 2015 #34
Both Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer explicitly state that it is an individual right Big_Mike Dec 2015 #35
big mike spreads misinformation jimmy the one Dec 2015 #36
I reiterate - I am not a lawyer. I have never been trained to think legalistically. I only repeat Big_Mike Dec 2015 #38
Interesting article about it here COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #37
So since the Russians have AK's do the framers still want us to use Muzzleloaders? ileus Dec 2015 #21
Absolutely unassailable arguments whose clarity is COLGATE4 Dec 2015 #22
Do you think the framers were stupid? Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #29
Has the organization you believe is the current "well regulated militia"... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #40
I've always enjoyed firing black powder weapons. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #9
Agreed-they are noisy, smokey, and a pain in the ass to clean and maintain-but fun friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #15
I have all 6 of those all in good working order... Historic NY Dec 2015 #28
~~~ discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I want a gun with some...»Reply #37