Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Guns and Racism [View all]
Those of us in favor of stronger laws to abate gun violence mostly support our cause by arguing against the claims of the gun lobby (roughly, the N.R.A. and gun manufacturers). It should by now be obvious that this is a waste of time. The case for action is overwhelming, but theres no chance of convincing the entrenched minority who are so personally (or financially) invested in gun ownership. Legislative efforts have failed because the opposition is more deeply committed more energized, more organized, more persistent.
My purpose here is not to continue arguing with the gun lobby or even to discuss the precise form that new gun legislation should take. Instead, Im interested in understanding the intensity gap and how we might overcome it. Only when theres a sustained passion against gun violence will there be a meaningful chance of effective action.
It might seem that fear of gun violence is the great motivator. Pro-gun advocates see guns as our best defense against armed criminals. Anti-gun advocates see the wide availability of guns as a greater threat than criminal violence. The issue seems to come down to what you fear more: criminals or guns.
But the passion of the gun lobby goes much deeper than fear of criminals. As Firmin DeBrabanders excellent book, Do Guns Make Us Free? demonstrates, the basic motivation of the pro-gun movement is freedom from government interference. They talk about guns for self-defense, but their core concern is their constitutional right to bear arms, which they see as the foundation of American freedom. The right to own a gun is, as the N.R.A. website puts it, the right that protects all other rights. Their galvanizing passion is a hatred of tyranny. Like many other powerful political movements, the gun lobby is driven by hatred of a fundamental evil that it sees as a threat to our way of life an existential threat quite apart from any specific local or occasional dangers.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/28/guns-and-racism/
My purpose here is not to continue arguing with the gun lobby or even to discuss the precise form that new gun legislation should take. Instead, Im interested in understanding the intensity gap and how we might overcome it. Only when theres a sustained passion against gun violence will there be a meaningful chance of effective action.
It might seem that fear of gun violence is the great motivator. Pro-gun advocates see guns as our best defense against armed criminals. Anti-gun advocates see the wide availability of guns as a greater threat than criminal violence. The issue seems to come down to what you fear more: criminals or guns.
But the passion of the gun lobby goes much deeper than fear of criminals. As Firmin DeBrabanders excellent book, Do Guns Make Us Free? demonstrates, the basic motivation of the pro-gun movement is freedom from government interference. They talk about guns for self-defense, but their core concern is their constitutional right to bear arms, which they see as the foundation of American freedom. The right to own a gun is, as the N.R.A. website puts it, the right that protects all other rights. Their galvanizing passion is a hatred of tyranny. Like many other powerful political movements, the gun lobby is driven by hatred of a fundamental evil that it sees as a threat to our way of life an existential threat quite apart from any specific local or occasional dangers.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/28/guns-and-racism/
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's amusing how much gun lovers hate tyranny but they cheer Constitution trampling legislation
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#3
Not only is your claim utter bullshit, it's hypocritical. I'm a host of DU's Civil Liberties Group:
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#13
DU gun lovers are nowhere near the norm. The stereotypical gun lover is a Repub.
LonePirate
Dec 2015
#14
"(S)tereotypical"? Your post is larded with stereotypes: "persecution complex", "impotent"
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2015
#15
"Intensity gap" and "overcoming" it: Maybe most people don't agree with the banners?
Eleanors38
Dec 2015
#21