Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)

7. More data manipulation with cherry picked time periods and exclusion

Reply to flamin lib (Original post)

Thu Dec 31, 2015, 01:00 PM

Dec 2015

of relevant yet contradictory data aka another Daniel Webster "study". If Exxon-Mobil published a study on climate change how many people would parrot it as gospel around here? Daniel Webster has made his livelihood advocating rights erosion and gun control.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fodder for the deniers . . . [View all] flamin lib Dec 2015 OP

Thanks... discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #1

How many times will the same article be posted? DonP Dec 2015 #2

Moms sez make gun murder illegal. ileus Dec 2015 #3

Johns Hopkins Center. Heh-heh.... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #4

Can you argue the data? nt flamin lib Dec 2015 #5

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #6

More data manipulation with cherry picked time periods and exclusion Kang Colby Dec 2015 #7

Denial is more than a river in Africa.nt flamin lib Dec 2015 #8

Yup, it's also a primary strategy for the failed gun control movement n/t DonP Dec 2015 #9