Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,720 posts)
13. walk like an egyptian
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 03:09 PM
Feb 2016

nuc uni: Many gun control advocates treat "regulation" to mean "restricted" whereas those without an prohibitionist agenda would see it as referring to "well-performing."

Here's webster's 1828 dictionary definition of 'regulate'; please point out which definition equates with 'well performing'. Thanks.

REGULATE 1. To adjust by rule, method or established mode; as, to regulate weights and measures; to regulate the assize of bread; to regulate our moral conduct by the laws of God and of society; to regulate our manners by the customary forms.
2. To put in good order; as, to regulate the disordered state of a nation or its finances.
3. To subject to rules or restrictions; as, to regulate trade; to regulate diet.

http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/regulate

Since it seems you are using 'perform' as an intransitive verb (the militia performed well), rather than transitive (the militia performed the parade march), I'm not sure you can even apply def #2, which is the best for you obviously - gives at least some basis - but hard to imagine james madison thinking along webster's lines in def #2.

nuc uni: In fact, there is nothing restrictive in the nature of regulation.

webster's 1828 dictionary: REGULATE To subject to rules or restrictions; as, to regulate trade; to regulate diet.
http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/regulate

You have to think like an egyptian to understand & argue properly word meanings.
A 225 year old egyptian, dismissing contemporary misconceptions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WHAT THE HELL??? Herman4747 Feb 2016 #1
1. It's not a "mere property" right. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #2
sure are a lot of gun toting pre-school dangerous criminals in the USa nt msongs Feb 2016 #3
What does that even mean? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #4
That poster seldom makes sense DonP Feb 2016 #7
It's like having someone angrily throw a fistful of feathers at you. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #8
A switchblade can be used in "self-defense"... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #9
If someone used a switchblade to fight of a violent criminal attacker that law would serve no Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #11
Yes. beevul Feb 2016 #15
do you know why switchblades are banned? gejohnston Feb 2016 #17
I don't think that call is yours to make.... beevul Feb 2016 #5
If it were about "right to life", benEzra Feb 2016 #6
Interesting that you should mention "bicycle"... Herman4747 Feb 2016 #10
How about alcohol? No one ever stopped an attacker by getting drunk. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #12
I'm not in a place where I can commute, benEzra Feb 2016 #21
False dichotomy. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #19
walk like an egyptian jimmy the one Feb 2016 #13
So you're adopting the RW interpretations. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #14
The following are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #16
bracketing jimmy the one Feb 2016 #22
re: "Controlling citizen's arms was not much a concern in 1791, they weren't as dangerous..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #23
Since the amendment doesn't restrict the RKBA to the militia... Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #18
You're correct but it's t fictions of others we're confronting. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Is the "well-regulated" a...»Reply #13