Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
14. Why did you introduce personal insults into this thread?
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 10:16 AM
Feb 2016

And why are you trying to use my profession in education against me?

I don't understand your motivation here.

I normally consider such kneejerk anti-intellectualism as a right wing Republican strategy.

Why do I encounter it here on DU?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think one of those... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #1
Some would have to complete their sentences first. N/T beevul Feb 2016 #21
There will always be those who are... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #22
Thus no nominee who is not an "individual right" advocate will have a chance at approval. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #2
That will be the Republican position, no doubt. stone space Feb 2016 #3
Why would the GOP come here? GGJohn Feb 2016 #4
Oh, come on! We've even had Zimmerman supporters come here. stone space Feb 2016 #5
Zimmerman supporters? GGJohn Feb 2016 #6
Are personal insults really necessary here? stone space Feb 2016 #9
A fact is not a personal insult. GGJohn Feb 2016 #10
More personal insults??? Seriously??? Why??? stone space Feb 2016 #11
Why do you always make yourself out to be the victim? eom. GGJohn Feb 2016 #12
Why did you introduce personal insults into this thread? stone space Feb 2016 #14
See, there you go again, GGJohn Feb 2016 #15
Now you are just trolling. stone space Feb 2016 #16
... GGJohn Feb 2016 #17
No personal insults... Puha Ekapi Feb 2016 #18
same here, I see facts Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #20
It's a shtick, seen early & often. Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #31
I am sure you will be able to supply links Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #8
so are you calling du members Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #7
That was precisely my point. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #13
Was his dissent in Maryland v King "bullshit" as well? Marengo Feb 2016 #19
That will be the position of any individual who values their rights. beevul Feb 2016 #24
Not sure how his death calls anything TeddyR Feb 2016 #23
Really? Where, exactly, does the Second Amendment mention or even allude to a flamin lib Feb 2016 #25
where does it say there isn't? gejohnston Feb 2016 #26
Are you against self defense? beevul Feb 2016 #27
ReallY???? Surf Fishing Guru Feb 2016 #28
I will ask again, flamin lib Feb 2016 #30
You are starting from an invalid foundation Surf Fishing Guru Feb 2016 #32
That is precisely what I said. Scalia found something in the Second Amendment that isn't there. flamin lib Feb 2016 #33
militia, clear & unequivocal in 1939 miller jimmy the one Feb 2016 #35
Hey jimmmy! I don't think there is doubt about the 2nd securing an individual right... jmg257 Feb 2016 #36
little problem with militia centric pov jimmy the one Feb 2016 #37
Ha - that is why I included points 2-4 - NO doubt what he was saying! nt jmg257 Feb 2016 #38
Do you deny a right to self-defense? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #34
Can't tell the difference between babies and bathwater, huh? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Antonin Scalia's death ca...»Reply #14