Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Cruz’s Gun Control Deception [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)13. gun studies by the VPC is like a climate change study
by the American Petrolium Institute or Koch Industries. I seriously doubt the "researchers" followed the scientific method by not starting with the conclusion they want and create a "study" to make it look academic. IOW, the thinking person dismisses them out of hand.
Criminologists, as reflected in the CDC study done in 2013, mostly agree that DGUs are quite common.
Closing loop-holes, better pre-screening for mental health and increased rigor with mandatory firearm training could be points that everyone in the USA could agree upon.
Why? What critieria for "mental health" would be used? They are very rarely violent, and those are almost impossible to detect. What does mandatory training do? Accidents are almost nonexistent as it is. What "loop hole"? A loop hole, like "assault weapon" is whatever some politician decides it is. None of them would actually do anything. We have a gang problem. We have over a million gang members in 35K gangs. Most of our murders are concentrated in a few urban areas, while the rest of the country has European level murder rates. If you look at our most northern states, most of them have lower murder rates than the Canadian provinces they border.
Those urban areas have murder rates like Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela. Here is a list of the the most violent cities. Most of them are in South America, but it lists places like Baltimore and Chicago.
What do they have in common? It isn't lax gun laws. Here is the real issue because all of them, including the US cities, had all of these in common
extreme wealth inequality
poor and crumbling infrastructure. Flint isn't alone nor the first with undrinkable water, it just made the news.
violent drug gangs
political corruption
Until we deal with those, we can have stricter than UK gun laws like Brazil and Mexico, or a complete ban like Venezuela, and none of it will make a difference.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-50-most-violent-cities-in-the-world-2015-1
One more thing, the NRA's "big money" is about the same as Planned Parenthood, look it up on Open Secrets. What they really do is mobilize the grassroots.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
re: "In 2014, Washington, D.C., reported 15.9 murders for every 100,000 people..."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2016
#7
I think they just desperately want to think of themselves as "moderates" on gun control
DonP
Apr 2016
#55
Simple Definition of conjecture : an opinion or idea formed without proof or sufficient evidence
aurelius2112
Apr 2016
#61
"I have come here...with the objective of trying to draw some consensus" I doubt that very much
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#67
OK, which *extant* gun regulation(s) would you be willing to give up, in exchange for others?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#71
You've pointed out once again the gun controller's fraudulent version of 'reasonableness':
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#73
"Assault weapons" are civilian non-automatics (mostly small caliber), not machineguns.
benEzra
Apr 2016
#50