Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

jmg257

(11,996 posts)

7. You would think. They do make that claim in their 1st Amended complaint.

Reply to beevul (Reply #5)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:52 PM

Apr 2016

Ah - NOW I see it - Nancy Lanza USED the AR entrusted to her by the defendants to share/give to Adam to further connect & bond with him.

http://www.koskoff.com/In-the-News/Sandy-Hook-Families-Complaint.pdf pg 16

So THAT is why Bushmaster is responsible!!
Or not.

"the term `negligent entrustment' means the supplying of a qualified product by a seller for use by another person when the seller knows, or reasonably should know, the person to whom the product is supplied is likely to, and does, use the product in a manner involving unreasonable risk of physical injury to the person or others."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

America Is About to See How Guns Used in Mass Shootings Are Marketed [View all] SecularMotion Apr 2016 OP

odd....my ARs are designed to save lives. ileus Apr 2016 #1

About time. nt flamin lib Apr 2016 #2

The judge's ruling not withstanding... Puha Ekapi Apr 2016 #3

It shouldn't, but you never know. jmg257 Apr 2016 #4

And even then... beevul Apr 2016 #5

You would think. They do make that claim in their 1st Amended complaint. jmg257 Apr 2016 #7

That reminds me of 6 'degrees of kevin Bacon'. N/T beevul Apr 2016 #8

Funny. beevul Apr 2016 #6

If discovery proceeds... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #9