Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Categorize the control mentality [View all]sarisataka
(21,344 posts)12. Thanks for the reply
I can appreciate honesty even if I am firmly opposed to the viewpoint expressed.
I just want to do a quick cost/benefit of a gun ban vs increased crime. For simplicity I will use the 2014 FBI crime stats-
There were an estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes (murder and non-negligent homicides, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults) reported by law enforcement.
Aggravated assaults accounted for 63.6 percent of the violent crimes reported, while robberies accounted for 28.0 percent, rape 7.2 percent, and murders 1.2 percent.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2015/september/latest-crime-stats-released/latest-crime-stats-released
I will use the low number, 500,000, for DGUs from the CDC report Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence - See more at: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2013/Priorities-for-Research-to-Reduce-the-Threat-of-Firearm-Related-Violence.aspx#sthash.rifljO0n.dpuf
The potential cost of a gun ban is an additional 318,000 aggravated assaults, 140,000 robberies and 36,000 rapes.
The benefit is 7000-8000 less murders and 19,000 less suicides.
Of course this assumes 100% effect in each category. It can be expected that differences would offset so any change that only affects guns but not underlying violence means we have 71 additional violent crime for each homicide prevented.
That may be acceptable to you but not to me. 71 people should not be expected to "take one for the team". Gun control divorced from any plan to address the root causes of violence is placebo that merely shifts the victim pool.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My answer would be about 2.15 (the "only" is problematic in a few choices)... nt
petronius
May 2016
#4
"Banning firearm ownership or even in outlawing certain types of hate speech"
CompanyFirstSergeant
May 2016
#23
The constitution is always questioned. That's one of the reasons we have a Supreme Court.
Fla Dem
May 2016
#30
The Constitutional Convention took place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787.
CompanyFirstSergeant
May 2016
#17
By that criteria, I can only assume you support banning Islam/Catholics/whatever.
Giggity
May 2016
#18
I chose the 3rd option. Most controllers are well-fitted to standard prohibitionist behavior.
Eleanors38
May 2016
#29