Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
3. This is a big one - if/when this gets bumped to the Supreme court
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:50 PM
May 2016

as other states have the "may issue" provisions.

These "good reason" requirements are out-right declared "unconstitutional".


Interesting, along with the review of Maryland's AWB, where the court was compelled "to conclude that the burden is substantial and strict scrutiny is the applicable standard of review for Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment claim".


Compared to New York Safe Act review, where the Court of Appeals came to "conclude that intermediate, rather than strict, scrutiny is appropriate".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»U.S. judge strikes down D...»Reply #3