Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
7. These bans look good, when supply & demand are left out of the equation...
Tue May 31, 2016, 02:34 PM
May 2016

Frankly, outside of a few wealthy collectors and a few nut-husslin' hoodlums, there ain't much demand for machine guns. Now, if silencers were much cheaper, and the feds ould drop their silly tax/paperwork requirements, millions would be sold, esp. to hunters.

All the federal police registration, records, fingerprints, interviews, and the other rustling paperwork which stimulates the NYT in its nether reaches, are what banners want:. Non-stop restrictions ending in bans. Same as it ever was.

EDIT:. Juding from secmo's quantity of sposts, it appears the NYT may be displacing the WaPo as propagandist-of-record for gun bans, quite an accomplishment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun Control That Actually...»Reply #7