Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
9. To follow up having read your post again
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:32 AM
Jun 2016

You do understand that Heller was about DC's gun control laws, correct? Here's the summary of the DC laws from Heller:

The District of Columbia generally prohibits the possession of handguns. It is a crime to carry an unregistered firearm, and the registration of handguns is prohibited. See D. C. Code §§7–2501.01(12), 7–2502.01(a), 7–2502.02(a)(4) (2001). Wholly apart from that prohibition, no person may carry a handgun without a license, but the chief of police may issue licenses for 1-year periods. See §§22–4504(a), 22–4506. District of Columbia law also requires residents to keep their lawfully owned firearms, such as registered long guns, “unloaded and dissembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device” unless they are located in a place of business or are being used for lawful recreational activities. See §7–2507.02.1


And Heller was a cop who carried a gun for his job but was denied a registration certificate for a gun he wanted to keep at home. So to clarify my prior statement, DC citizens were only recently permitted to own handguns, yet hundreds of murders are committed each year by criminals with handguns. So yeah, DC has a criminal problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Appeals court halts U.S. ...»Reply #9