Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun Violence Is a Full-Blown National Crisis [View all]The Second Amendment plainly states that the right to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed." It doesn't say the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Georgia supreme court in 1846:
Nor is the right involved in this discussion less comprehensive or valuable: "The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed." The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled under foot by Charles I and his two wicked sons and successors, reestablished by the revolution of 1688, conveyed to this land of liberty by the colonists, and finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna Charta!
If you think that the Second Amendment has run its course because the militia is no longer viable and that was the only reason for the Amendment then get Congress and the states to repeal the Amendment on those grounds.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is in some neighborhoods. 68 people were shot Memorial Day weekend in Chicago alone
lostnfound
Jun 2016
#4
Any attempt at "confiscating them all and locking them up" would kill more people...
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2016
#31
Yep, I like my gunz and I will be keeping them for many years. And then when I'm gone my
Waldorf
Jun 2016
#89
This is nothing more than an argumentum ad populum, with a dash of cultural cringe
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#96
Mainstream where your are (or not), it's *still* argumentum ad popularum
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#107
Dozens of people in one region is not the world, so don't try to pass it off as that...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#98
After Sandy Hook Republicans passed laws that make it easier to have more guns around
Botany
Jun 2016
#6
Inner city Milwaukee keeps electing pro-gun Sheriff who asks constituents to buy guns
HereSince1628
Jun 2016
#8
Crimes done with firearms, as well as all violent crime is at the lowest it's been in decades.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2016
#9
Is that what it's really about? Deaths? Or is it just guns you don't like?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#19
The NYT got those numbers from a subreddit called "Guns Are Cool". They are not actual statistics.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2016
#20
I believe the N Hollywood thugs killed no one. But THEY got dead via rifles... from a gun shop.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#67
Interesting perspective, plus there would be the advantage that no controller...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#110
I wish they would take seriously my theory of the turn-around heat-seeking missile...
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#74
If I said that LYING about our "epidemic of violence" was a full-blown national crisis......
pablo_marmol
Jun 2016
#113