Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,603 posts)
4. comprehension required
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jun 2016
"You took two sentences out of context and truncated them to make it appear they were both referring to gun laws..."


They are both about gun laws. The post I linked makes the claim that, in one case a law is effective and, in a different case, another law is not effective. SYG would include cases of self-defense where a gun is used. BGCs and gun dealer laws are, you know, laws.

Here I'm left to conclude that pro-RKBA/self-defense laws are bad and don't work while gun-control laws do work. If you take the position that laws can be effective and then make claims against the ones you don't like, I just get suspicious.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm not surprised at the inconsistency [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 OP
Well, what do you know? The Joyce Foundation was cited. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #1
Crime doesn't pay, gun-control does n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #2
baloney 2 jimmy the one Jun 2016 #3
comprehension required discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #4
more deceit jimmy the one Jun 2016 #5
I invite you to do some shadow boxing discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I'm not surprised at the ...»Reply #4