Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
20. "Naaa, it's maximum lethality against human beings."
Mon Jun 27, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jun 2016

Yet just a very small percentage of these guns are actually used to kill humans, and nearly always by members of society with criminal records. Of course the pro-restriction side needs to invoke the 'designed for' "argument" to distract from the 'actually used for' reality, while concealing who is committing the violence.

Integrity........not the pro-restriction sides strong suit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»What is the marketing mes...»Reply #20