Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
28. There are two problems with any ban (weapon -or- magazine):
Fri Jul 1, 2016, 08:26 AM
Jul 2016

Those two problems are: extant supply and 3D printing.

Tens of millions of "assault weapons" already in distribution mean that there will be a supply of these available for the foreseeable future. Firearms are very durable goods (they have to be to withstand the forces involved) and can last for generations. The experience of those states and other jurisdictions that have banned these weapons clearly demonstrates that compliance with any ban will be very low.

Moreover, we are on the verge of 3D printing becoming commonplace. There are already plans for a number of weapons readily available online. Materials advances aren't far from making completely 3D printed guns quite workable (and some of the trickier parts, like barrels, could be sourced from the massive supply of extant weapons). Magazines would be simple.

It may be the case that banning as a methodology has become obsolete for relatively simple items like these. If so, other approaches have to take center stage.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Logical And Well Put.... global1 Jun 2016 #1
A question discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #2
Realistically... Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #8
An "assault weapon"... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #15
So you ban handgrips that stick out, leaving equally capable firearms without protruding handgrips. benEzra Jun 2016 #23
Your last paragraph makes an excellent point. mainstreetonce Jun 2016 #3
Thank you (eom) Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #9
Those who want to commit mass murder will find a satisfactory method... Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #21
Additionally, Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #24
outside of the US, they do use full autos gejohnston Jun 2016 #25
Why wouldn't real gun control ban all guns? ileus Jun 2016 #4
Oh yes, just like the illegal act... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #5
There's a difference between drugs and guns Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #10
Someone who... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #13
Not deterred Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #16
...just like all those heroin addicts that *could*... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #20
And, btw Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #17
yes and Japan is not anywhere as individualistic as we are gejohnston Jun 2016 #18
I hunt with one of... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #19
Even felons who turn a new page often seek out a weapon for self-defense... Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #22
Logic fail - the actual common denominator (the 'problem') is a PERSON intent on killing. jonno99 Jun 2016 #6
In a sense you are correct... Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #11
Nobody has suggested "banning people". But as long as there are jonno99 Jun 2016 #12
. Shankapotomus Jun 2016 #14
As I pointed out in another response to you TeddyR Jun 2016 #26
"Some say the key to stopping mass killings is to ban all Muslims entry to the country." jmg257 Jun 2016 #7
Very good post. deathrind Jun 2016 #27
There are two problems with any ban (weapon -or- magazine): Lizzie Poppet Jul 2016 #28
Valid points... deathrind Jul 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Banning all Muslims vs. B...»Reply #28