Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
4. Such a proposal isn't too out of land with, IMO, a proper view of the Second Amendment...
Wed Nov 16, 2016, 01:53 PM
Nov 2016

The Second recognizes a right to keep and bear arms that no state shall deny as protected by the Fourteenth. Reciprocity would thereby follow. The question is the method of carry: Concealed or Open. Of course, no state can constitutionally deny both, and any state can recognize both methods of carry. But the states can recognize one method while denying the other as the Second does not speak to the methodology. It would appear, however, that any proposed legislation is limited to concealed-carry. There may be a question as to training/certification in the various states and how reciprocity would deal with this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Local gun-carrying restri...»Reply #4